The American Journal of Health Promotion:
Merging Science and Practice
The American Journal of Health Promotion was created to serve two editorials
goals:
1. To reduce the gap between the science and practice of health promotion,
and
2. To provide a forum for discussion among the many disciplines involved in
health promotion.
We believe that striving to achieve these goals will help our field advance
at the fastest possible pace.
Reducing the gap between the science and practice. Too often, practitioners
design programs without full knowledge of what research has already show to be
effective and ineffective. As a result, many programs are less effective and
more expensive than they should be. Equally common, scientists often conduct
research without a clear sense of the real needs and constraints of practice. As
a result, much of our research is wasted on irrelevant questions and many
important questions are never addressed. We believe we can help to narrow the
gap between science and practice can by integrating science and practice in all
the work we publish. We strive to integrate science and practice by requiring
authors to write in a style that makes sense to both scientists and
practitioners. We also require authors to explain the practical and research
implications of their work at the end of each article in a section called
"SO WHAT!" Additionally, each issue includes a 12 page section called
"The Art of Health Promotion" which is dedicated to providing
practical information to make programs more effective. Finally, we draw on both
scientists and practitioners for our readership, authors and editorial board.
Providing a forum for discussion among diverse disciplines. Advancing our
field is further hampered by fragmentation caused by the many disciplines
involved in health promotion. For example, in designing a weight control program
a nutritionist might focus on the best food to eat, a physiologist on the amount
and type of exercise a psychologist on the connections between eating and
emotions, a physician on metabolic imbalances, a social worker on work and
family factors, an anthropologist on the influence of societal norms, a teacher
on curriculum exposure, a communication specialist on advertising and media
influences, a political scientist on agricultural subsidy programs, a city
planner on access to sidewalks and parks, and a transportation engineer on access
to public transit an economist on the relative cost of healthy versus unhealthy
foods. The best solution would be to include input from all of these and other
disciplines. Ultimately, to help the full population achieve optimal health, we
need to create communities that provide all residents with the knowledge,
encouragement, opportunity and resources necessary for ongoing healthy lifestyle
practices. To achieve these goals, we need to draw on the skills of traditional
public health, medical and clinical fields as well as those who plan and design
our communities and the laws and policies that govern them. To meet this goal of
integrating multiple disciplines The American Journal of Health Promotion
strives to engage diverse disciplines through our broad and diverse editorial
content and editorial board. Our 18 editorial
sections include four broad categories: Interventions, Strategies,
Applications and Research Methods. Original research, literature reviews and
editorials Our reviewers include over 250 of the top scientists and
practitioners drawn from diverse fields
Interventions Fitness
Medical Self Care
Mind-Body Health
Nutrition
Smoking Control
Social Health
Spiritual Health
Stress Management
Weight Control
Strategies
Behavior Change
Culture Change
Health Policy
Applications
Health Promoting Community Design
The Art of Health Promotion
Underserved Populations
Research Methods
DataBase
Financial Analysis
Measurement Issues
Methods, Issues, and Results in Evaluation and Research
Qualitative Research
Read the Editors notes from back issues of the American
Journal of Health Promotion
| 2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
Nov/Dec
(23,2) |
Nov/Dec
(22,2) |
Nov/Dec
(21,2) |
Nov/Dec
(20,2) |
Nov/Dec
(19,2) |
Nov/Dec
(18,2) |
Nov/Dec
(17,2)
|
Nov/Dec
(16,2) |
Sept/Oct
(23,1) |
Sept/Oct
(22,1) |
Sept/Oct
(21,1) |
Sept/Oct
(20,1) |
Sept/Oct
(19,1) |
Sept/Oct
(18,1) |
Sept/Oct
(17,1) |
Sept/Oct (16,1) |
Jul/Aug
(22,6) |
Jul/Aug
(21,6) |
Jul/Aug
(20,6) |
Jul/Aug
(19,6) |
Jul/Aug
(18,6) |
Jul/Aug(17,6) |
Jul/Aug(16,6) |
Jul/Aug
(15,6) |
May/Jun
(22,5) |
May/Jun
(21,5) |
May/Jun
(20,5) |
May/Jun
(19,5) |
May/Jun
(18,5) |
May/Jun
(17,5) |
May/Jun(16,5) |
May/Jun
(15,5) |
Mar/Apr
(22,4) |
Mar/Apr
Special Issue
(21,4) |
Mar/Apr
(20,4) |
Mar/Apr
(19,4) |
Mar/Apr
(18,4) |
Mar/Apr
(17,4) |
Mar/Apr
(16,4) |
Mar/Apr
(15,4) |
Jan/Feb
(22,3) |
Jan/Feb
(21,3) |
Jan/Feb
(20,3) |
Jan/Feb
Special Issue
(19,3) |
Jan/Feb
(18,3) |
Jan/Feb
(17,3) |
Jan/Feb
(16,3) |
Jan/Feb
(15,3) |
Read In Briefs from back issues of the American
Journal of Health Promotion.
| 2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Nov/Dec
(23,2) |
Nov/Dec
(22,2) |
Nov/Dec
(21,2) |
Nov/Dec
(20,2) |
Nov/Dec
(19,2) |
Nov/Dec
(18,2) |
Nov/Dec
(17,2)
|
Nov/Dec
(16,2) |
Nov/Dec
(15,2) |
Sept/Oct
(23,1) |
Sept/Oct
(22,1) |
Sept/Oct
(21,1) |
Sept/Oct
(20,1) |
Sept/Oct
(19,1) |
Sept/Oct
(18,1) |
Sept/Oct
(17,1) |
Sept/Oct
(16,1) |
Sept/Oct
(15,1) |
Jul/Aug
(22,6) |
Jul/Aug
(21,6) |
Jul/Aug
(20,6) |
Jul/Aug
(19,6) |
Jul/Aug
(18,6) |
Jul/Aug
(17,6) |
Jul/Aug
(16,6) |
Jul/Aug
(15,6) |
Jul/Aug
(14,6) |
May/Jun
(22,5) |
May/Jun
(21,5) |
May/Jun
(20,5) |
May/Jun
(19,5) |
May/Jun
(18,5) |
May/Jun
(17,5) |
May/Jun
(16,5) |
May/Jun
(15,5) |
May/Jun
(14,5) |
Mar/Apr
(22,4) |
Mar/Apr
(21,4) |
Mar/Apr
(20,4) |
Mar/Apr
(19,4) |
Mar/Apr
(18,4) |
Mar/Apr
(17,4) |
Mar/Apr
(16,4) |
Mar/Apr
(15,4) |
Mar/Apr
(14,4) |
Jan/Feb
(22,3) |
Jan/Feb
(21,3) |
Jan/Feb
(20,3) |
Jan/Feb
(19,3) |
Jan/Feb
(18,3) |
Jan/Feb
(17,3) |
Jan/Feb
(16,3) |
Jan/Feb
(15,3) |
Jan/Feb
(14,3) |
|